Skip to content Skip to sidebar Skip to footer

[Download] "Telander v. Posejpal" by Illinois Appellate Court — Second District Affirmed in Part and Reversed in Part * Book PDF Kindle ePub Free

Telander v. Posejpal

๐Ÿ“˜ Read Now     ๐Ÿ“ฅ Download


eBook details

  • Title: Telander v. Posejpal
  • Author : Illinois Appellate Court — Second District Affirmed in Part and Reversed in Part
  • Release Date : January 17, 1981
  • Genre: Law,Books,Professional & Technical,
  • Pages : * pages
  • Size : 66 KB

Description

The present litigation involves four parties: John C. Telander, a general contractor and land developer who is president of Telander Brothers Contractors, Inc.; Joseph M. Jura, a real estate broker; George H. Posejpal, the owner of a 54-acre farm which Telander contracted to buy and intended to develop as part of a planned unit development; and three architects, Michael Coan, Jesse Horvath and Bruce Liljeros, who did business as the Chicago Design Collaborative. On May 7, 1973, the plaintiffs, Telander and Jura, brought suit against the defendant, Posejpal. In count I, Telander alleged that Posejpal had breached a real estate sale contract which Telander and Posejpal had entered into on April 28, 1972, while Jura alleged in count II that the defendant failed to pay him a real estate commission which was owing to him under the terms of the Telander-Posejpal contract. In his answer, Posejpal denied both that he had breached the contract with Telander and that Jura was entitled to a broker's commission. In addition, Posejpal counterclaimed against Jura, alleging that he had loaned Jura $5,000 which was to be applied toward the purchase price of a piece of property, known as the Johnson farm, which Jura had contracted to buy and that Jura had failed to repay the loan. On May 21, 1975, the three architects, Coan, Horvath and Liljeros, petitioned the court to intervene in the litigation involving Telander, Jura and Posejpal. In their petition to intervene and accompanying complaint, they alleged that Telander had refused to pay them for certain architectural services which they had rendered the plaintiffs. The court subsequently granted the petitioners leave to intervene.


PDF Ebook Download "Telander v. Posejpal" Online ePub Kindle